*
And then the thing is to review the record ... continually.
I hypothesize that the effectiveness of a recorded thought is related to the frequency with which it is reviewed. I hypothesize that the effectiveness of a collection of recorded thoughts is related to the frequency with which the recorded thoughts in it are reviewed.
It is possible - because: magic - that just recording thoughts will produce a complete effect.
It is possible - because: magic - that just looking at the record of a thought, or even just displaying it, will produce a complete effect.
Even so, I hypothesize there is a relationship between the frequency with which a thought is thoroughly reviewed and the record's effectiveness.
The record of a thought might be a collection of words. Thorough review of the record of a thought could mean actually reading those words and striving to form a mental image of what they mean. Let's say it means that.
Well, if it is, for some reason, very difficult to actually read the record of a thought (even though it has been displayed), that would then, according to this hypothesis, reduce the potential effectiveness of the record ... or it could.
My hypothesis then becomes: if, when the record is displayed, the entire record is instantaneously visible, or nearly so - and if its geometry is fairly simple - then a thorough review of it should be possible ... in a short period of time.
*
